DPRG
DPRG List  



[DPRG] progress on Hough transform and small robot

Subject: [DPRG] progress on Hough transform and small robot
From: Chris Jang cjang at ix.netcom.com
Date: Sun Jan 21 01:24:52 CST 2007

Hello,

The basic Hough transform code works but is even less reliable than the 
object recognition of soda and beer cans. It needs work.

http://golem5.org/embedcv/images/hough.jpg

The bright points in the Hough transform image correspond to the detected 
red lines in the (histogram equalized) edge image.

One thing I've noticed in real world images is that horizontal edges tend 
to be much stronger than vertical or diagonal orientations. My theory is 
that this is an optical effect. Horizontal edges tend to remain within the 
camera's depth of field under even lighting.

I'm also starting to think that thresholding the Hough transform of a 
Sobel edge image is too difficult. The algorithm is very sensitive to 
noise and does not reject it very well. Better edge detection than vanilla 
linear convolution is required.

Another thing I'm going to do is test EmbedCV on a 1/12 scale RC car. Here 
is a picture of it.

http://golem5.org/embedcv/images/littlebro.jpg

It cost $15 (unsold Christmas product) and has full suspension (not much 
travel but all four wheels are sprung) and a rear differential. There is 
no PWM and steering is full deflection bang-bang. The wheels are rubber. 
It is just wide enough that a PC 104 SBC can fit inside the body. I'm 
thinking of the Technologic TS-7260 ARM9 board. The battery pack voltage 
is stable enough that I think everything can run off the same pack without 
isolation between the motor drive and digital electronics. A notebook 
webcam attached to the roof provides a camera.

This toy is small enough to fit in a shoebox and so can run on the DPRG 
warehouse course area. It's big brother is about 10x heavier and barely 
fits in the trunk of my car. I have not been able to make much progress 
with it as the logistics of testing are involved. I'm hoping that less is 
more and this smaller robot allows for accelerated development.

One thing that amazes me is how much faster buying off-the-shelf is. It 
took months to build a frame, drivetrain, motor control electronics and 
electronics enclosure for the big robot. If it proves easy to hack the 
motor control of this toy and all electronics can just be stuffed inside 
it, then there's easily an order of magnitude improvement in development 
time. This isn't quite true - cost has been shifted from hardware to 
software. I've been working on EmbedCV for several months and it is still 
far from working on a robot. If this works, it may be a better time/money 
tradeoff for many people who wish to build robots - COTS vehicle platforms 
with 32 bit embedded computers and more advanced signal processing for 
sensing the environment.

My theory is that PWM speed control added to the rear drive is enough that 
bang-bang steering is ok. I think that driving in smooth curves is 
somewhat difficult. Most robots drive in straight lines. They only turn 
when pointed in the wrong direction. That's how I'm viewing this robot. 
When turning, it can just slow down so the vision and control system can 
keep up with the angular rate of turn. Then once pointed in the right 
direction, it can increase speed.

Here's a better photograph of the electronics board inside the toy.

http://golem5.org/embedcv/images/img3868.jpg

If anyone has some experience regarding hacking this kind of thing, I 
would appreciate your advice. I plan on using the DIO lines (appropriately 
level shifted and buffered) from the ARM9 SBC to tap into the existing RC 
circuits and control the car. I'd like to leave the radio receiver 
electronics in place too. Right now, I am thinking absolutely minimal 
modification.

Some things I recognize. Those three big diodes must be for motor flyback 
voltage. There's a coil and IC for the radio. Does anyone know what that 
company insignia is? Where can I find a datasheet? There are a whole bunch 
of bipolar transistors for motor control. I didn't expect this many. I'll 
reverse-engineer and diagram the circuit soon.

Chris

More information about the DPRG mailing list

Copyright © 1984 - 2006 Dallas Personal Robotics Group. All rights reserved.
Website Design by NCC

For the latest robot news visit robots.net