|
[DPRG] Rules
Subject: [DPRG] Rules
From: Ralph Tenny
rten at metronet.com
Date: Wed Sep 19 11:47:54 CDT 2001
Now that we have passed through the contest in fine shape, when do we
tackle the rules update?
Ralph
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Ralph Tenny wrote:
> I see no reason for a rules change; the rule as it stands supports the
> possibility of interpretation to separate recognition and collection.
> Ralph
>
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2001, Rodent wrote:
>
> > I agree with you, but its too close to the contest to modify the rules.
> > Might be some sour grapes if we do.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >
> >
> > > Since I volunteered to be a judge for some the events on Saturday, I
> > thought
> > > it a good idea to read over the rules and came up with a question. In the
> > > rules for can-can it is stated:
> > >
> > > Cans that are retrieved are automatically counted as being correctly
> > > located.
> > >
> > > Does this mean that "scooper" style bots that simply run in a straight
> > line
> > > and scoop up as many cans as the human lined it up to get are awarded n*15
> > > for collecting the cans as well as n*10 for locating the cans? Doesn't
> > seem
> > > right to me since the robot didn't locate the cans, the human did. Just
> > > thought I would ask what the opinions of the club were.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > DPRGlist mailing list
> > DPRGlist at dprg.org
> > http://nimon.ncc.com/mailman/listinfo/dprglist
> >
>
More information about the DPRG mailing list
|